↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001501.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Mihaela Grigore, Julie Brown, Martha Hickey, Cindy Farquhar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Other 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 78 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 93 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,836,133
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,550
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,659
of 422,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.