↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001501.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Mihaela Grigore, Julie Brown, Martha Hickey, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 14%
Researcher 26 11%
Other 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 76 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 93 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,248,324
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,789
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,812
of 436,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.