| Title |
Interventions for emergency contraception
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001324.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Shen, Yan Che, Emily Showell, Ke Chen, Linan Cheng |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 24% |
| Germany | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 347 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 15% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 20% |
| Unknown | 106 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 12% |
| Unknown | 119 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,132,147
of 24,516,705 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,430
of 12,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,429
of 446,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,516,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.