↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for emergency contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for emergency contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001324.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Shen, Yan Che, Emily Showell, Ke Chen, Linan Cheng

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 376 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 14%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 147 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 10%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 163 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,056,673
of 26,745,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,942
of 13,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,602
of 451,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,745,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.