↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions versus no pharmacological intervention for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions versus no pharmacological intervention for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007472.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmoud Abu-Amara, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Satoshi Hori, George Glantzounis, Barry Fuller, Brian R Davidson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 34 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,467,265
of 19,943,904 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,520
of 11,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,629
of 366,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,943,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.