The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003331.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Long, Ify R Mordi, Charlene Bridges, Viral A Sagar, Edward J Davies, Andrew JS Coats, Hasnain Dalal, Karen Rees, Sally J Singh, Rod S Taylor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 918 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 918 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 102 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 98 | 11% |
| Researcher | 77 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 146 | 16% |
| Unknown | 395 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 201 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 126 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 91 | 10% |
| Unknown | 434 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#680,344
of 26,381,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,178
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,406
of 452,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.