↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
690 Mendeley
Title
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003331.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Long, Ify R Mordi, Charlene Bridges, Viral A Sagar, Edward J Davies, Andrew JS Coats, Hasnain Dalal, Karen Rees, Sally J Singh, Rod S Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 690 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 690 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 87 13%
Student > Master 86 12%
Researcher 61 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 6%
Other 137 20%
Unknown 231 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 104 15%
Sports and Recreations 22 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 2%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 86 12%
Unknown 269 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#553,782
of 21,002,580 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,163
of 12,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,611
of 368,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,002,580 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.