| Title |
Mesenchymal stromal cells as treatment or prophylaxis for acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease in haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with a haematological condition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009768.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila A Fisher, Antony Cutler, Carolyn Doree, Susan J Brunskill, Simon J Stanworth, Cristina Navarrete, John Girdlestone |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 280 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 99 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 113 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,762,550
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,294
of 12,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,549
of 437,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.