↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mesenchymal stromal cells as treatment or prophylaxis for acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease in haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with a haematological condition

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Mesenchymal stromal cells as treatment or prophylaxis for acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease in haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with a haematological condition
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009768.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila A Fisher, Antony Cutler, Carolyn Doree, Susan J Brunskill, Simon J Stanworth, Cristina Navarrete, John Girdlestone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 14 8%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 51 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 58 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,697,739
of 17,033,237 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,353
of 11,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,075
of 343,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,033,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.