| Title |
Immunonutrition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012041.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahilanandan Dushianthan, Rebecca Cusack, Victoria A Burgess, Michael PW Grocott, Philip C Calder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Isle of Man | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 279 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 18% |
| Unknown | 118 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 133 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,099,332
of 23,427,600 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,478
of 12,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,068
of 439,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,427,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.