| Title |
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006471.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zena EH Moore, Declan Patton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 24% |
| Ireland | 7 | 10% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 30% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 480 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 7% |
| Researcher | 31 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 17% |
| Unknown | 199 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 117 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 11% |
| Unknown | 214 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#753,364
of 24,407,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,482
of 12,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,408
of 445,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,407,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.