↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for pulmonary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
Title
Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for pulmonary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012621.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley Barnes, Zoe Brown, Andrew Burns, Trevor Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 363 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 18 5%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 150 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 168 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,227,403
of 26,126,599 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,407
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,471
of 451,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,126,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.