↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to promote patient utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
94 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to promote patient utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007131.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Santiago de Araújo Pio, Gabriela SS Chaves, Philippa Davies, Rod S Taylor, Sherry L Grace

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 485 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 48 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 69 14%
Unknown 176 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 19%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Psychology 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 1%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 200 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#471,280
of 22,180,330 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#918
of 12,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,721
of 374,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,180,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.