↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011724.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Bruschettini, Olga Romantsik, Simona Zappettini, Colm PF O'Donnell, Maria Grazia Calevo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,518,398
of 17,499,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,784
of 11,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,624
of 346,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,499,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.