| Title |
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006542.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter F Day, Monty Duggal, Hani Nazzal |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Cuba | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 35% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 284 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 106 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 107 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,081,898
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,284
of 12,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,454
of 446,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.