↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006542.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter F Day, Monty Duggal, Hani Nazzal

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 284 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 24 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Researcher 15 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 106 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Psychology 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 107 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,081,898
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,284
of 12,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,454
of 446,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.