↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006542.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter F Day, Monty Duggal, Hani Nazzal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 307 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Researcher 17 6%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 123 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Psychology 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 124 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,151,031
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,369
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,413
of 447,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.