↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Haemoglobin and haematocrit targets for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Haemoglobin and haematocrit targets for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003967.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, Suetonia C Palmer

Abstract

Anaemia affects 60% to 80% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reduces quality of life and is a risk factor for early death. Treatment options are blood transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa. Recently higher haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (HCT) targets have been widely advocated because of positive associations with improved survival and quality of life from observational studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 24 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,054,932
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,728
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,507
of 225,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.