↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003710.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janine Dretzke, William D Toff, Gregory YH Lip, James Raftery, Anne Fry-Smith, Rod S Taylor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 253 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Psychology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Unspecified 10 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 57 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,514,813
of 25,386,440 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,615
of 12,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,069
of 63,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.