↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise training for advanced lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
85 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
562 Mendeley
Title
Exercise training for advanced lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012685.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn J Peddle‐McIntyre, Favil Singh, Rajesh Thomas, Robert U Newton, Daniel A Galvão, Vinicius Cavalheri

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 562 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 70 12%
Student > Master 58 10%
Researcher 35 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 6%
Unspecified 33 6%
Other 113 20%
Unknown 219 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 12%
Sports and Recreations 46 8%
Unspecified 33 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 3%
Other 56 10%
Unknown 248 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#651,602
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,092
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,168
of 462,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.