The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011828.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim M Nielsen, Ann‐Dorthe Zwisler, Rod S Taylor, Jesper H Svendsen, Jane Lindschou, Lindsey Anderson, Janus C Jakobsen, Selina K Berg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 315 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Researcher | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 134 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 12% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 158 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,848,282
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,325
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,386
of 462,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.