↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012828.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Apiwat Aue‐aungkul, Khadra Galaal, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Master 20 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 82 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Unspecified 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 87 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,914
of 11,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,543
of 457,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.