↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Iodine fortification of foods and condiments, other than salt, for preventing iodine deficiency disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
Title
Iodine fortification of foods and condiments, other than salt, for preventing iodine deficiency disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010734.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Alvin R Santos, Anthea Christoforou, Kathy Trieu, Briar L McKenzie, Shauna Downs, Laurent Billot, Jacqui Webster, Mu Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 292 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 71 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 19%
Psychology 12 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 94 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,034,231
of 15,565,939 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,876
of 11,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,587
of 340,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,565,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.