| Title |
Honey and lozenges for children with non-specific cough
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007523.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Selamawit Mulholland, Anne B Chang |
| Abstract |
Chronic non-specific cough is a chronic, dry cough of in the absence of identifiable respiratory disease or known aetiology. Although it is usually not reflective of an underlying severe illness, it does cause significant morbidity, and as such relief from it is often sought. The use of honey and lozenges to soothe upper respiratory tract irritation is common, inexpensive, and potentially more effective in treating the symptoms than pharmacological interventions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 27% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,650,712
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,759
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,972
of 93,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.