The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007857.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma L O'Lone, Elisabeth M Hodson, Ionut Nistor, Davide Bolignano, Angela C Webster, Jonathan C Craig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 56 | 17% |
| Unknown | 148 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 163 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,931,539
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,949
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,321
of 369,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.