↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
Title
Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007857.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma L O'Lone, Elisabeth M Hodson, Ionut Nistor, Davide Bolignano, Angela C Webster, Jonathan C Craig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 315 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Master 30 9%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 14 4%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 140 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Unspecified 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 154 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,842,316
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,958
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,831
of 367,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.