| Title |
Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007857.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma L O'Lone, Elisabeth M Hodson, Ionut Nistor, Davide Bolignano, Angela C Webster, Jonathan C Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 127 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 141 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,677,828
of 24,124,090 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,784
of 12,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,431
of 357,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,124,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.