↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012873.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milita Zaheed, Nicholas Wilcken, Melina L Willson, Dianne L O'Connell, Annabel Goodwin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Other 10 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 54 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 58 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,052,687
of 22,100,435 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,717
of 12,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,178
of 286,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,100,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.