Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Milita Zaheed, Nicholas Wilcken, Melina L Willson, Dianne L O'Connell, Annabel Goodwin
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||11||85%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||8%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||28||15%|
|Student > Master||15||8%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||6%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||11||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||51||28%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||15||8%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||12||7%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||10||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||2||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,989,683 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 355,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.