↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012873.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milita Zaheed, Nicholas Wilcken, Melina L Willson, Dianne L O'Connell, Annabel Goodwin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 16 8%
Other 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 98 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Unspecified 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 103 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,852,126
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,981
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,021
of 366,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.