↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006655.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khadra Galaal, Hannah Donkers, Andrew Bryant, Alberto D Lopes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Other 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 62 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Unspecified 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 73 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,735,319
of 21,796,013 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,951
of 12,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,832
of 285,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,796,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.