↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Music during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Music during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia for improving maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006914.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malinee Laopaiboon, Pisake Lumbiganon, Ruth Martis, Patravoot Vatanasapt, Busaba Somjaivong

Abstract

Evidence on the benefits of music during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia to improve clinical and psychological outcomes for mothers and infants has not been established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 212 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 36%
Psychology 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 44 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,579,233
of 18,623,929 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,852
of 11,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,741
of 231,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,623,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.