↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000114.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Young, Peter von Dadelszen, Zarko Alfirevic

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 22%
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Psychology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,661,653
of 17,508,799 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,145
of 11,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,902
of 275,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,508,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.