↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000114.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Young, Peter von Dadelszen, Zarko Alfirevic

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,509,050
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,662
of 13,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,627
of 295,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.