↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000114.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Young, Peter von Dadelszen, Zarko Alfirevic

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 54 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Psychology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 60 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,315
of 291,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.