↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo HB Yoo, Vania Santos Nunes‐Nogueira, Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas, Cathryn Broderick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 21 12%
Other 14 8%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 54 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 64 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,756,301
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,436
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,404
of 367,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.