@ProfJennyGamble @susan_bewley @pash22 @drruthannharpur @chungopailot @NICEComms @BlottMaggie @jimgthornton @catherineroyuk @OAAinfo Our reminder of the Cochrane Review, for example. https://t.co/qiQGa3YB7n Yes, there's still some scurrying about for newer
@drruthannharpur Presumably you looked at the Cochrane review? https://t.co/S2Yu7kEC5X Note three possible mechanisms of action - and physiological distraction is not confused with gate control https://t.co/ZAgZWG3qFq
RT @Minderofgaps: @doctor_oxford Cochrane says no: https://t.co/Nj25d059Sd
@Noicle @Juliejtm @EmergMedDr Cochrane says it’s bollocks, so your argument is basically ‘placebo effects work on some people so let’s offer placebos’ which is pretty shaky ethical ground https://t.co/YyCDEPeiWX
RT @RehabDocGuru: @Retlouping It’s interesting, until your post, I was not familiar with the practice itself. This study suggests 1) ther…
@Retlouping It’s interesting, until your post, I was not familiar with the practice itself. This study suggests 1) there is no placebo effect, and 2) the receivers of the injections wouldn’t be aware anyways. https://t.co/MfJddl57kB
@doctor_oxford Cochrane says no: https://t.co/Nj25d059Sd
@BrynKemp @EmergMedDr Here is the data you refer to - please can you clarify https://t.co/ME7PlRF2tY
@OldburySally @lynn_laidlaw And here's the Cochrane review from 2012 https://t.co/x7orQ6krHI
@drruthannharpur Frequentist: “no sig diff between sterile water & saline for rates of caesarean section (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.33-1.02), instrumental delivery (RR 1.31, 95%CI 0.79-2.18), rescue analgesia (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.44-1.69).” Bayesian: probably lowe
@BlondiieMama @catherineroyuk @NICEComms Cochrane Collaboration review of available studies says insufficient evidence for effectiveness of the procedure https://t.co/yE9DurZJo9
@catherineroyuk @NICEComms The most recent Cochrane systematic review (2012) concludes: We found little robust evidence that sterile water is effective for low back or any other labour pain. @NICEcomms is there more recent high-level evidence over-ruling t
@HienSoul Aquí otra referencia: https://t.co/7rQD35JRNU Se puede administrar cada 1,5-2 horas, porque va perdiendo eficacia con el tiempo, pero como es inocua, no hay problema. Lástima que me lo dieran a las 11:30am, y no a las 3am, cuando llegué con contr
@martaaaapc Quizás tengas que aprender a usar una biblioteca https://t.co/4Lb3JNOLid
@Oller1999 Toma Sonia, para que te calles un rato https://t.co/4Lb3JNOLid
RT @catherineroyuk: @EmilyJBarley @barnshospital Even the Cochrane review which starts with the natural childbirth mantra "pain is made wor…
RT @drruthannharpur: @MartynPitman @catherineroyuk But, as to whether the evidence stacks up in favour of injecting sterile water into wome…
@MartynPitman @catherineroyuk But, as to whether the evidence stacks up in favour of injecting sterile water into women during labour … Cochrane says no https://t.co/YSdGSo2ksr
@catherineroyuk there is a review - evidence inconclusive https://t.co/FdfXu0lzku. so yes, it has been around for ages and yes it has been offered by some NHS staff. It is also popular in the US as alternative pain relief
@EmilyJBarley @barnshospital Even the Cochrane review which starts with the natural childbirth mantra "pain is made worse by fear & anxiety" concludes: "We found little robust evidence that sterile water is effective for low back or any other labour pa
@fergusonelaine @SophieMcAllis13 @believemeithurt Cochrane wasn’t on board with the evidence base suggesting usefulness, even in labour. They haven’t updated the review for 10 years though. https://t.co/rtnoO24CQ1
https://t.co/Upbs4V7QbU “No good evidence….”
Retweeted Ann Taylor (@AnnMTaylor61): https://t.co/QrIGkU3M0S https://t.co/OSXzxQHpJJ https://t.co/W0ZB0yNlGy
@KDeurloo Net als steriele waterinjecties bewezen effectief maar helaas weinig toegepast, zeker niet in 2e lijn: https://t.co/W4o2fGWVYJ
Twee meta-analyses over water bij baringspijn http://t.co/pVhjNSqsNR en http://t.co/pNlRE9T8yB via @AngelaVerbeeten en @JKNL
@Verlosk_coach Dan is dus de vraag voor wie #swi wel geschikt is, gegeven het feit dat het niet werkt. http://t.co/PgzjF0gOYw
@sljvalk @dokterbertho @gynaecoloog Dan wel graag eerst bewijzen dat het comfortverhogend is... http://t.co/PgzjF0gOYw
Interesting article "Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with..." (via #pubmedontap) http://t.co/4VmOwVybtJ
Interesting article "Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with..." (via #pubmedontap) http://t.co/4VmOwVybtJ
@AngelaVerbeeten @frederiekweeda Onwerkzaamheid is toch al bewezen? 'Little evidence that sterile water is effective' http://t.co/GHndBC37Ac
@livmarije @chamwamba @frederiekweeda @vrouwenarts @dokterbertho @waltervh #cochrane 'little evidence' dat t werkt http://t.co/UDpN1sA1Ty
Waterboarding, watergeneeskunde, waterinjecties: liever niet. @nvog #kwakzalverij #baringspijn http://t.co/g3hHzfxWQb
More studies needed for sterile papule injections: http://t.co/pthYK4gK #doulaparty #labor#cochrane
Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pa... http://t.co/qgqRARCI #psychology
Ont skall med ont fördrivas, men när det gäller förlossning verkar smärtsamma vatteninjektioner inte så bra. http://t.co/qzgmcmFC
Lower Back Pain: CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes reported severely limit conclusions for clinical pract... http://t.co/qDvPk9uf #lowerbackpain
Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls fo... http://t.co/Petj191K #psychology