↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intralesional treatment versus wide resection for central low‐grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Intralesional treatment versus wide resection for central low‐grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010778.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin F Dierselhuis, Krista A Goulding, Martin Stevens, Paul C Jutte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Unspecified 16 10%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 8 5%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 63 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 27%
Unspecified 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 71 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,784,715
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,726
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,724
of 366,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.