↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation followed by three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation alone for primary hepatocellular carcinoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation followed by three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation alone for primary hepatocellular carcinoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012244.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liming Lu, Jingchun Zeng, Zehuai Wen, Chunzhi Tang, Nenggui Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 11 5%
Researcher 9 4%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 98 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 109 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#16,784,715
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,726
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,944
of 365,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.