↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica F Chen, Carole H Kim, Anne L Coleman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 71 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,891,059
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,288
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,285
of 366,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.