↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica F Chen, Carole H Kim, Anne L Coleman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 47 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,832,011
of 21,955,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,302
of 12,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,593
of 287,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,955,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.