| Title |
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012223.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica F Chen, Carole H Kim, Anne L Coleman |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 63 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,093,069
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,542
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,530
of 352,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.