↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
54 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
722 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012449.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan A Bohren, Blair O Berger, Heather Munthe‐Kaas, Özge Tunçalp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 722 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 722 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 13%
Student > Bachelor 74 10%
Researcher 62 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 4%
Other 118 16%
Unknown 290 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 170 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 89 12%
Social Sciences 44 6%
Psychology 30 4%
Unspecified 15 2%
Other 64 9%
Unknown 310 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#413,961
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#692
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,441
of 381,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.