↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009037.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shanshan Han, Caroline A Crowther, Philippa Middleton

Abstract

Pregnancy hyperglycaemia without meeting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnostic criteria affects a significant proportion of pregnant women each year. It is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although intensive management for women with GDM has been proven beneficial for women and their babies, there is little known about the effects of treating women with hyperglycaemia who do not meet diagnostic criteria for GDM and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 306 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 19%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Other 21 7%
Other 63 20%
Unknown 64 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Psychology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 78 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,574,410
of 14,239,448 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,375
of 10,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,888
of 211,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#250
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,239,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.