↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

External counterpulsation for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
External counterpulsation for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009264.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sen Lin, Ming Liu, Bo Wu, Zilong Hao, Jie Yang, Wendan Tao

Abstract

External counterpulsation (ECP) may improve cerebral blood flow, and it has been proposed as a potential therapy for patients with ischaemic stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 5 6%
Unspecified 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,108,552
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,913
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,581
of 245,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.