↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early and late adverse renal effects after potentially nephrotoxic treatment for childhood cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Early and late adverse renal effects after potentially nephrotoxic treatment for childhood cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008944.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esmee CM Kooijmans, Arend Bökenkamp, Nic S Tjahjadi, Jesse M Tettero, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Helena JH van der Pal, Margreet A Veening

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 16 7%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 77 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 87 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,252,430
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,030
of 12,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,532
of 351,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.