The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well‐being and care needs of people with cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012387.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bojoura Schouten, Bert Avau, Geertruida E Bekkering, Patrick Vankrunkelsven, Jeroen Mebis, Johan Hellings, Ann Van Hecke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 388 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 14% |
| Unknown | 151 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 18% |
| Psychology | 25 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 164 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,684,498
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,434
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,064
of 367,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.