| Title |
Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008101.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miranda Langendam<sup>a</sup>, Yoeri M Luijf<sup>a</sup>, Lotty Hooft, J Hans DeVries, Aart H Mudde, Rob JPM Scholten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 460 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 13% |
| Researcher | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 85 | 18% |
| Unknown | 136 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 175 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 9% |
| Psychology | 20 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 146 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#872,803
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,685
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,139
of 251,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.