↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005060.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uriëll L Malanda, Laura MC Welschen, Ingrid I Riphagen, Jacqueline M Dekker, Giel Nijpels, Sandra DM Bot

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been found to be effective for patients with type 1 diabetes and for patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. There is much debate on the effectiveness of SMBG as a tool in the self-management for patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 35 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Mathematics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unknown 35 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#534,058
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#957
of 12,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,972
of 254,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.