↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009786.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roelien van de Vrie, Marianne J Rutten, Joyce Danielle Asseler, Mariska MG Leeflang, Gemma G Kenter, Ben Willem J Mol, Marrije Buist

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 49%
Engineering 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 24 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,467,462
of 16,427,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,626
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,336
of 272,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,427,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.