↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009786.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roelien van de Vrie, Marianne J Rutten, Joyce Danielle Asseler, Mariska MG Leeflang, Gemma G Kenter, Ben Willem J Mol, Marrije Buist

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Unspecified 5 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 39 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#10,831,936
of 19,846,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,258
of 11,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,322
of 284,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,846,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.