| Title |
Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009786.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roelien van de Vrie, Marianne J Rutten, Joyce Danielle Asseler, Mariska MG Leeflang, Gemma G Kenter, Ben Willem J Mol, Marrije Buist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Russia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,843,854
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,168
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,949
of 364,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.