↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane Reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011890.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Gibson, Benedict M Wand, Catherine Meads, Mark J Catley, Neil E O'Connell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Student > Master 26 13%
Other 11 6%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 71 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 17%
Engineering 5 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 77 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#660,897
of 21,749,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,391
of 12,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,516
of 289,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,749,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.