↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain ‐ an overview of Cochrane Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
47 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain ‐ an overview of Cochrane Reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011890.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Gibson, Benedict M Wand, Catherine Meads, Mark J Catley, Neil E O'Connell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 333 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Other 19 6%
Researcher 18 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 5%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 152 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 13%
Engineering 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 164 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#376,820
of 26,150,897 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#616
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,080
of 368,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.