↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
258 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000324.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra J Hajenius, Femke Mol, Ben Willem J Mol, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Willem M Ankum, Fulco Van der Veen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 385 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 60 15%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Postgraduate 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 9%
Other 83 21%
Unknown 73 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 213 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Psychology 13 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 86 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,315,638
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,929
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,403
of 174,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.