↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004273.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Wetzels, Mirjam Harmsen, Chris Van Weel, Richard Grol, Michel Wensing

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 169 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Psychology 17 10%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2012.
All research outputs
#8,745,608
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,729
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,810
of 175,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.