↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004273.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Wetzels, Mirjam Harmsen, Chris Van Weel, Richard Grol, Michel Wensing

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Psychology 16 10%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 35 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,953
of 12,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,966
of 161,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.