↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First aid glucose administration routes for symptomatic hypoglycaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
First aid glucose administration routes for symptomatic hypoglycaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013283.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmy De Buck, Vere Borra, Jestin N Carlson, David A Zideman, Eunice M Singletary, Therese Djärv

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 4%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 77 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 84 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,116,709
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,248
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,326
of 368,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.