↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hepatic late adverse effects after antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Hepatic late adverse effects after antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008205.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renée L Mulder, Dorine Bresters, Malon Van den Hof, Bart GP Koot, Sharon M Castellino, Yoon Kong K Loke, Piet N Post, Aleida Postma, László P Szőnyi, Gill A Levitt, Edit Bardi, Roderick Skinner, Elvira C van Dalen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 12 6%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 79 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 91 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,902,147
of 20,842,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,606
of 12,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,631
of 230,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,842,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.