↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008765.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thuria Al Rawahi, Alberto D Lopes, Robert E Bristow, Andrew Bryant, Ahmed Elattar, Supratik Chattopadhyay, Khadra Galaal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ecuador 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 164 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Researcher 22 13%
Other 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 39 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,579,574
of 17,749,513 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,015
of 11,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,689
of 278,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,749,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.