↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008765.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thuria Al Rawahi, Alberto D Lopes, Robert E Bristow, Andrew Bryant, Ahmed Elattar, Supratik Chattopadhyay, Khadra Galaal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Ecuador 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 228 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 11%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 20 8%
Other 56 24%
Unknown 62 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 67 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,362,968
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,295
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,667
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.