↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Screening hysteroscopy in subfertile women and women undergoing assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Screening hysteroscopy in subfertile women and women undergoing assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012856.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohan S Kamath, Jan Bosteels, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Srividya Seshadri, Steven Weyers, Ben Willem J Mol, Frank J Broekmans, Sesh Kamal Sunkara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 70 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 79 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,257,036
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,601
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,138
of 351,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.