| Title |
Screening hysteroscopy in subfertile women and women undergoing assisted reproduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012856.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohan S Kamath, Jan Bosteels, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Srividya Seshadri, Steven Weyers, Ben Willem J Mol, Frank J Broekmans, Sesh Kamal Sunkara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 55 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,283,212
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,175
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,307
of 320,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.