↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical treatment for botulism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Medical treatment for botulism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008123.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin H Chalk, Tim J Benstead, Joshua D Pound, Mark R Keezer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 34 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,118,647
of 16,551,934 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,844
of 11,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,899
of 273,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,551,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.