The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006400.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kåre Birger Hagen, Marte Gjeitung Byfuglien, Louise Falzon, Sissel Urke Olsen, Geir Smedslund |
| Abstract |
The question of what potential benefits and harms are associated with certain dietary regimes used in rheumatoid arthritis is an important one for many patients and health care providers. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 16% |
| Researcher | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 90 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#963,281
of 26,367,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,753
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,244
of 190,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.