↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006400.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kåre Birger Hagen, Marte Gjeitung Byfuglien, Louise Falzon, Sissel Urke Olsen, Geir Smedslund

Abstract

The question of what potential benefits and harms are associated with certain dietary regimes used in rheumatoid arthritis is an important one for many patients and health care providers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 249 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 48 19%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 35 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 47 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#742,376
of 18,940,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,767
of 11,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,068
of 230,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,940,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.