| Title |
Hospital nurse‐staffing models and patient‐ and staff‐related outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Butler, Timothy J Schultz, Phil Halligan, Ann Sheridan, Leigh Kinsman, Thomas Rotter, Jonathan Beaumier, Robyn Gail Kelly, Jonathan Drennan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 26 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 14% |
| France | 6 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 51% |
| Scientists | 26 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 556 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 7% |
| Researcher | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 95 | 17% |
| Unknown | 236 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 151 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 6% |
| Unknown | 250 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#663,938
of 25,500,206 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,229
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,921
of 363,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,500,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.