↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
99 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
Title
Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Butler, Timothy J Schultz, Phil Halligan, Ann Sheridan, Leigh Kinsman, Thomas Rotter, Jonathan Beaumier, Robyn Gail Kelly, Jonathan Drennan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 379 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 140 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 102 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 19%
Social Sciences 20 5%
Psychology 5 1%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 152 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#492,644
of 21,172,126 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,005
of 12,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,807
of 288,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,172,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.