↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hospital nurse‐staffing models and patient‐ and staff‐related outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
94 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
544 Mendeley
Title
Hospital nurse‐staffing models and patient‐ and staff‐related outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Butler, Timothy J Schultz, Phil Halligan, Ann Sheridan, Leigh Kinsman, Thomas Rotter, Jonathan Beaumier, Robyn Gail Kelly, Jonathan Drennan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 544 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 542 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 7%
Researcher 38 7%
Other 22 4%
Other 91 17%
Unknown 229 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 148 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 15%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Psychology 6 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 242 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#661,536
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,224
of 12,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,110
of 355,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.