↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009487.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Hardt, Joerg J Meerpohl, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Peter Kienle, Stefan Post, Florian Herrle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 37 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 42 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,745,695
of 19,680,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,890
of 11,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,020
of 284,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,680,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.