| Title |
Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009487.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Hardt, Joerg J Meerpohl, Maria‐Inti Metzendorf, Peter Kienle, Stefan Post, Florian Herrle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Romania | 1 | 20% |
| Denmark | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 65 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 74 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,930,558
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,313
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,155
of 364,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.