The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009537.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Woodhouse, Jennifer K Burton, Namrata Rana, Yan Ling Pang, Jennie E Lister, Najma Siddiqi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 18% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 76% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 534 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 13% |
| Researcher | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 106 | 20% |
| Unknown | 209 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 17% |
| Psychology | 21 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 67 | 13% |
| Unknown | 227 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,061,171
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,992
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,145
of 367,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.