The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011903.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bhavan Prasad, Jasper Bondad, Nikhil Vasdev, Jim Adshead, Tim Lane, Kamran Ahmed, Mohammed S Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Khurshid Guru, Piotr L Chlosta, Omar M Aboumarzouk |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 23% |
Spain | 5 | 8% |
Turkey | 3 | 5% |
United States | 3 | 5% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 28% |
Scientists | 13 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 174 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 14% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 27 | 16% |
Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Unknown | 71 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,051,593
of 26,604,138 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,943
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,693
of 367,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,604,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.