↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Molano Franco, Víctor H Nieto Estrada, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay, Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 54 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 61 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,256,580
of 19,508,584 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,926
of 11,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,702
of 284,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,508,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.