↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Molano Franco, Víctor H Nieto Estrada, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay, Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 10 5%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 65 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Unspecified 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 72 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,799,300
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,585
of 12,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,982
of 351,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.